The Woke foreign policy

Liberals, irrespective of their alignment on the political spectrum, have a markedly simpler approach to foreign affairs.According to them, the world is divided into two categories of countries.One kind possesses a democratic system, while the others are characterised by authoritarian regimes.Democracy refers to all Western nations, whereas authoritarianism pertains to the remaining countries that resist Western colonial endeavours.A country is deemed a democracy if it acquiesces to a colonialization initiative.For instance, Ukraine is classified as a democracy, despite having an unelected president, years of governance without elections, extensive media censorship, and the prohibition of numerous opposition groups.
The theoretical rationale for democracy and authoritarianism is derived from Juan José Linz, a right-wing political scientist cultivated in U.S. academia, whose work offers an ideological basis for colonial endeavours.In a dichotomy where the globe is divided between democratic and authoritarian camps, colonial nations are readily categorised as democratic, while any opposition is designated as dictatorial.Education in a Western country philosophically conditions individuals to have a woke perspective on foreign policy.This explains why Westerners, regardless of whether they identify as left or right, possess a worldview aligned with woke foreign policy.
Western nations leverage their institutional authority to propagate this concept globally.They employ several methods to do that.Primarily, they possess the mass media sector, which has popularised the concept of a woke foreign policy.Secondly, they cultivate their own cadre of intellectual compradors in impoverished nations to disseminate these views via academic networks (scholarships, etc.).Thirdly, these nations sustain NGOs in poor countries to propagate the tenets of their progressive foreign policy.

The primary peril of woke foreign policy is in its impact on poor countries striving for development and seeking to extricate themselves from colonial legacies.Their development philosophy lacks a realistic perspective due to an ideological disconnection influenced by Western propaganda associated with woke foreign policy.When one is ideologically predisposed to perceive the globe as unipolar and views colonial nations as exemplars of growth, they overlook the pragmatic pathways to genuine progress.This explains why many liberals in poor countries fail to recognise the world's new trends.The ascendance of China and other Asian powers, the emergence of a multipolar world, and the diverse policy options arising from this new global order.Even in affluent nations, the left has struggled to develop a coherent worldview because to their ideological conditioning by woke foreign policy.

By adopting an objective perspective and transcending Western propaganda, one might discern how certain impoverished nations profit from the emerging multipolar world.How they utilise the emerging multipolar world to decolonise nations.

Notwithstanding the Western rhetoric around woke foreign policy, nations will inevitably gravitate towards a multipolar worldview, as this is a material tendency and an unavoidable conclusion.